Floating home not covered under maritime law

Tuesday January 15, 2013 10:30 AM

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court says a Florida man's floating home was a house, not a boat, and not covered under maritime law.

The high court on Tuesday ruled 7-2 for Fane Lozman, who argued that his gray, two-story vessel in the marina in Riviera Beach, Fla., should not have been affected by maritime law.

City officials used U.S. maritime law to impose a lien on Lozman's property. Lozman argued that it was a house, which would have given it some protection from seizure under state law. Federal judges sided with the city, and the property was seized and destroyed.

The court, in an opinion by Justice Stephen Breyer, said that decision was wrong. Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Anthony Kennedy dissented.

More than 5,000 Americans own floating homes.

©2013 by The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Currently in Columbus
86°
Partly Cloudy

Today

Full schedule
8:00
NCIS: Los Angeles
9:00
NCIS
10:00
NCIS
11:00
10TV News @ 11PM
11:35
Late Show with David Letterman